BiddingOwl and Handbid both support nonprofit fundraising auctions, but they take different approaches to pricing, bidding, payments, event management, and support. BiddingOwl has no standard annual core-auction subscription and charges 5% on winning online/mobile bids. Handbid uses quote-based licensing and does not charge a percentage of funds raised. The better fit depends on your auction format, revenue mix, technology preferences, and support needs.
Last verified: September 19, 2026
Disclosure: BiddingOwl publishes this comparison. Handbid information in this article was reviewed against current official Handbid pricing, product, payment, support, and help documentation. We include areas where Handbid may be the better fit and recommend confirming current provider terms before making a purchasing decision.
| Feature | BiddingOwl | Handbid |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Auction-centered nonprofit fundraising | Auctions, fundraising events, ticketing, giving, and event management |
| Standard software pricing | No standard monthly or annual core-auction subscription; 5% performance fee on winning online/mobile bids | Quote-based license; typically annual; no percentage of funds raised |
| Published license price | Yes — performance pricing is publicly explained | No standard license amount published; requires quote |
| Items / bidders | Auction-centered model without annual pricing tiers | Unlimited items, guests, and bidders included in every license |
| Online/mobile bidding | Yes | Yes |
| Browser bidding | Yes | Yes |
| Native bidder app | No dedicated app required | Optional iOS/Android app |
| Traditional paper bid sheets | Yes | Platform primarily emphasizes mobile/digital bidding |
| Live auctions | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid auctions | Yes | Yes |
| Specialized auction formats | Silent, live, online, mobile, paper, pre-bid, hybrid | Silent, live, hybrid, sealed, timed, simulcast, forward, reverse, and other formats |
| Tickets / registration | Yes | Yes, including QR check-in and Tap to Pay |
| Donations | Yes | Yes |
| Fund-a-Need / paddle raise | Yes | Yes |
| Text-to-Give | Not positioned as a dedicated Text-to-Give product | Yes |
| Peer-to-peer fundraising | Auction-centered platform | Yes |
| White-label platform | Customizable BiddingOwl auction experience | Dedicated white-label offerings available |
| Integrated payment options | Stripe or PayPal | Handbid card/ACH payment environment |
| Card required before bidding | Optional with Stripe vaulting | Optional; spending threshold can also be configured |
| Automatic winner charging at close | No | No |
| Cash / check workflow | Yes | Yes |
| Event phone support | 24/7 critical emergency support | Night-of-event phone support included in every current license |
| General support | Phone, email, training, help resources | Support channels vary by service tier |
Neither platform is universally better. The biggest differences are the pricing model, traditional paper-auction flexibility, mobile-app options, broader fundraising tools, payment processing, branding options, and support structure.
BiddingOwl does not charge a standard monthly subscription or setup fee for core auction use.
A 5% performance fee applies to winning online/mobile bids.
For example:
| Winning online/mobile bid | BiddingOwl performance fee |
|---|---|
| $100 | $5 |
| $500 | $25 |
| $1,000 | $50 |
| $10,000 total winning online/mobile bids | $500 |
The important distinction is what that percentage applies to.
BiddingOwl's 5% performance fee does not apply to:
Electronic payment-processing fees are separate.
See BiddingOwl Pricing and Silent Auction Fees and Buyer's Premiums Explained for additional details.
This pricing model can be particularly relevant for organizations whose fundraiser includes a mixture of online auction revenue and tickets, direct donations, Fund-a-Need, traditional paper bidding, or live-auction revenue.
Handbid uses a different pricing model.
Handbid does not publish a standard software-license amount. Instead, organizations receive a quote based on factors such as the events they plan to run and the service/support level they want.
According to Handbid's current pricing information, a one-year license is standard and events run during that term are covered.
Handbid also states that every current license includes:
Handbid does not charge a percentage of funds raised.
Its currently published payment-processing rates are:
| Payment type | Handbid published rate |
|---|---|
| Visa, Mastercard, Discover | 3.5% + $0.30 |
| American Express | 3.95% + $0.30 |
| ACH | 1.5% |
Handbid states that there is no additional platform percentage added on top of these payment-processing rates.
Organizations can also ask guests whether they would like to cover card-processing costs at checkout.
The significant limitation when comparing price is that Handbid's software license itself is quote-based.
That means a nonprofit cannot determine its total Handbid cost from the public website alone.
See Handbid Pricing for its current licensing and payment information.
There is no reliable universal answer because the platforms use fundamentally different pricing models.
BiddingOwl's software cost can be calculated from the amount of winning online/mobile bidding:
Winning online/mobile bids × 5%
Handbid's software license is quote-based, but Handbid does not take a percentage of funds raised.
That means Handbid may be economically attractive to an organization with substantial online auction revenue if its quoted license cost is favorable.
BiddingOwl may be attractive to an organization that:
Handbid may be attractive to an organization that:
Because Handbid does not publish its license amount, a meaningful comparison should use an actual Handbid quote rather than an estimated or historical price.
If you're evaluating different auction pricing structures, see Free Auction Software for Nonprofits.
Yes.
Both platforms allow supporters to participate from a mobile browser.
BiddingOwl bidders participate through the browser on their phone, tablet, or computer. They do not need to download a dedicated BiddingOwl bidder app.
Learn more in Silent Auction Mobile Bidding Without an App.
Handbid also supports browser-based mobile bidding.
In addition, Handbid offers a native mobile-app experience. Its current feature materials state that guests can bid from a native iOS or Android app or directly through their browser.
See Handbid Mobile Bidding and Handbid's full feature overview.
That is a genuine difference.
An organization that wants to avoid asking supporters to install an app can use either platform through the browser.
An organization that specifically wants a native bidder-app option may prefer Handbid.
This is a clearer difference between the platforms.
BiddingOwl intentionally supports traditional paper silent auctions in addition to online/mobile bidding.
Organizations can use printable bid sheets and traditional auction-management tools, and those workflows are not subject to BiddingOwl's 5% online-bid performance fee.
Handbid's current product positioning is much more strongly centered on mobile and digital bidding.
Its mobile-bidding platform emphasizes supporters browsing, bidding, receiving notifications, and checking out from their phones.
That does not make one philosophy universally better.
Organizations that want to move fully to digital/mobile bidding may prefer Handbid's approach.
Schools, churches, clubs, rural organizations, and other fundraisers that intentionally want the option to run a traditional paper auction—or move gradually between paper and mobile formats—may find BiddingOwl's paper-auction flexibility more useful.
Handbid supports a particularly broad range of auction formats.
Its full platform feature overview describes:
Handbid also provides dedicated competitive bidding tools.
This breadth can matter for organizations running more sophisticated or specialized auction programs.
BiddingOwl is more specifically centered around nonprofit fundraising formats such as:
For many small and midsized nonprofit fundraising events, either platform can handle the core auction workflow.
Organizations requiring specialized auction formats should evaluate Handbid's broader tools carefully.
For guidance on combining online and in-person auction activity, see How to Run a Hybrid Silent Auction.
Both BiddingOwl and Handbid allow organizations to control whether bidders must provide a payment method before bidding.
Organizations using Stripe can optionally enable card vaulting.
Even when vaulting is enabled, supporters can:
without entering a credit card.
When the supporter takes an applicable transactional action—such as placing a bid, purchasing tickets, or making a donation—the payment-method requirement appears.
Stripe securely handles the saved payment credentials.
For auction winners, the administrator controls when an applicable saved Stripe card is charged.
BiddingOwl does not automatically charge every winner merely because the auction closes.
For the full workflow and tradeoffs, see Should You Require a Credit Card Before Bidding?.
Handbid also lets organizations decide whether a card is required before online bidding.
Its financial settings include an additional option: a spending threshold.
According to Handbid's credit-card processing documentation, if the organization enables the card requirement without entering a threshold, bidders must provide a card before placing a bid.
If the organization sets a threshold, bidders can participate without a card until their bidding reaches that configured amount.
Handbid provides more detail in its auction-settings documentation.
Handbid also states that cards are not automatically charged simply because a bidder has one on file.
This spending-threshold option is a genuine Handbid advantage for organizations that want more granular control over when a payment method becomes mandatory.
BiddingOwl organizations can use:
When Stripe vaulting is enabled, the administrator can later charge an applicable saved card.
The administrator controls that charge.
See Silent Auction Checkout Best Practices for winner notification, payment collection, unpaid winners, pickup, and reconciliation.
Handbid supports payment collection through its payment environment and publishes both card and ACH processing rates.
Handbid's card settings state that credit cards on file are not automatically charged.
That allows bidders to pay electronically while preserving other payment possibilities such as cash or check where the organization allows them.
See Handbid's credit-card processing documentation and Handbid Pricing for the current workflow and published rates.
The two platforms are therefore more similar in this area than an older comparison might suggest.
Both can use stored payment information while preserving administrator control over collection.
The integrated payment structures are different.
BiddingOwl supports:
For more information, see Credit Card Processing for Nonprofits.
Handbid currently publishes processing for:
According to Handbid Pricing, its published ACH rate is 1.5% with no per-transaction fee.
Handbid also promotes Tap to Pay as part of its ticketing and registration system.
For organizations with substantial sponsorships, table purchases, or major gifts, ACH may be useful.
For organizations that specifically want PayPal, BiddingOwl has a clear distinction because PayPal is one of its integrated options.
Both platforms support ticketed fundraising events.
Handbid's event-management functionality is broader in this area.
Its Ticketing & Registration platform currently includes features such as:
BiddingOwl supports admission-ticket sales as part of its auction and fundraising workflow, but it is more auction-centered.
An organization where complex seating, guest management, check-in logistics, and event administration are major requirements may prefer Handbid's deeper event-management tools.
An organization primarily running an auction with ticket sales attached may not need that additional complexity.
Handbid extends beyond auctions into broader fundraising.
Its current platform includes or promotes:
BiddingOwl also includes fundraising tools beyond bidding, including:
The difference is one of emphasis.
Handbid has developed into a broader fundraising-event ecosystem.
BiddingOwl remains more tightly centered on auctions and the fundraising activities that commonly surround them.
For a broader discussion of what nonprofits should evaluate, see Auction Software for Nonprofits: How to Choose the Right Platform.
Handbid has a significant advantage for organizations requiring a fully white-labeled platform.
According to Handbid's White-Label Auction Software, its white-label offering can include:
This can be valuable for universities, hospitals, professional organizations, large charities, and other organizations where the technology provider needs to sit almost entirely behind the organization's own brand.
BiddingOwl allows organizations to create and customize their auction experience, but it is not positioned as the same type of fully white-label enterprise platform.
If complete brand ownership is a core requirement, Handbid deserves serious consideration.
Both platforms provide live-event support, but their models differ.
BiddingOwl publishes:
See BiddingOwl Customer Service for current information.
Handbid uses service tiers.
According to its current Support Policy, service levels determine the normal support channels, response expectations, and whether a customer receives a named or dedicated contact.
Handbid's published tiers currently range from email/chat support through higher levels that include phone support, named contacts, dedicated account managers, or dedicated technical contacts.
Importantly, Night of Event live phone support is included at every tier.
Handbid states that the event must be registered at least five business days in advance for guaranteed Night of Event coverage.
Its event-support window begins one hour before the registered event start and continues until one hour after the stated close time or until final bidder checkout is complete, whichever is later.
That is a genuine Handbid strength.
BiddingOwl's advantage is straightforward published access to phone and email help generally, plus 24/7 critical emergency support.
Handbid's advantage is a formal tiered structure with clearly documented event-window phone coverage.
Handbid may be the stronger choice when your organization:
Those are meaningful product strengths and should be part of the decision.
BiddingOwl may be the stronger choice when your organization:
For a broader look at alternatives, see BiddingOwl Alternatives.
BiddingOwl's 5% performance fee can become more expensive than a fixed-license platform when an organization generates a large amount of winning online/mobile auction revenue.
Payment-processing costs remain separate.
BiddingOwl also does not currently offer some of Handbid's broader capabilities, such as:
Organizations seeking a broader year-round fundraising and event ecosystem may therefore prefer Handbid.
The biggest purchasing limitation is pricing transparency.
Handbid does not publish a standard software-license amount.
Organizations need to speak with Handbid and receive a quote before they can calculate the complete software cost.
Handbid states that its licenses are term-based, with a one-year license being standard. Its pricing page also states that licenses renew automatically and that written notice is required before the renewal date according to the customer's agreement.
See Handbid Pricing for its current licensing language.
Handbid's product philosophy is also heavily digital/mobile.
Organizations that specifically want to continue using traditional paper bid sheets as a regular auction operating model should confirm that workflow carefully before selecting the platform.
Normal support channels also depend on the service tier, although Handbid's Support Policy includes registered Night of Event live phone support at every tier.
Finally, some of Handbid's broader or enterprise-oriented capabilities may be more functionality than a small volunteer-run fundraiser actually needs.
| Your highest priority | Start with | Why |
|---|---|---|
| No standard annual core-auction subscription | BiddingOwl | Core pricing is tied to winning online/mobile bids |
| No percentage of funds raised | Handbid | Handbid states it does not charge commission on proceeds |
| Transparent software-cost formula before speaking with sales | BiddingOwl | The 5% online-bid model is publicly documented |
| Quote-based annual relationship | Handbid | Licensing is configured around events and support needs |
| One occasional nonprofit auction | BiddingOwl | No standard annual core-auction commitment |
| Multiple substantial events per year | Handbid | Events during the license term are covered |
| Traditional paper bid sheets | BiddingOwl | Paper auction tools are an intentional part of the platform |
| Fully digital/mobile auction | Either | Both support browser-based mobile bidding |
| Native bidder-app option | Handbid | Native-app participation is available |
| No bidder app required | Either | Both allow browser participation |
| PayPal integration | BiddingOwl | Stripe and PayPal are BiddingOwl's integrated choices |
| ACH payments | Handbid | Handbid publishes ACH processing |
| Card threshold before bidding | Handbid | A threshold can determine when a card becomes required |
| Optional Stripe vaulting | BiddingOwl | Supporters can browse first; payment method is required only when taking an applicable transaction when vaulting is enabled |
| Text-to-Give | Handbid | Dedicated tool |
| Peer-to-peer fundraising | Handbid | Dedicated P2P tools |
| QR check-in / seating / Tap to Pay | Handbid | Deeper event-management workflow |
| Full white-label solution | Handbid | Dedicated white-label platform and branded-app options |
| Direct general phone support | BiddingOwl | Published phone/email support |
| Live event phone support | Either | Both publish event/critical support models |
| Traditional + online + mobile + live flexibility | BiddingOwl | Particularly useful where paper and digital workflows coexist |
For a small nonprofit, the decision often comes down to how much platform you actually need.
Handbid offers a sophisticated event and fundraising ecosystem.
That may be valuable if your organization runs multiple events, needs advanced registration and check-in, wants Text-to-Give or peer-to-peer fundraising, prefers a native app option, or has enough event complexity to benefit from formal service tiers.
But more functionality is not automatically better.
A school PTO, church, animal rescue, club, or volunteer-run nonprofit may instead prioritize:
In that situation, BiddingOwl may be the simpler fit.
The useful question is:
Which platform matches the fundraiser your volunteers will actually run?
Before choosing either platform, build a realistic event and test registration, browsing, bidding, payment collection, a cash/check winner, item pickup, reporting, and support.
If you're comparing several systems, see Best Silent Auction Platforms for Nonprofits.
Neither is universally better. Handbid may be preferable for organizations wanting quote-based licensing, native apps, broad event-management tools, Text-to-Give, peer-to-peer fundraising, white-label options, ACH, or specialized auction formats. BiddingOwl may be preferable for organizations wanting no standard annual core-auction subscription, published pricing, traditional paper-auction support, Stripe or PayPal, and direct auction-focused support.
Handbid does not publish a standard software-license amount. Pricing is provided after a conversation about the organization's events and support needs. Handbid states that a one-year license is standard and that it does not charge a percentage of funds raised.
See Handbid Pricing.
No. Handbid states that it does not charge a commission based on funds raised. Payment-processing charges are separate.
Handbid currently publishes:
See Handbid Pricing and verify current rates before signing an agreement.
BiddingOwl has no standard monthly subscription or setup fee for core auction use. A 5% performance fee applies to winning online/mobile bids. Traditional paper/live auction tools, tickets, donations, Fund-a-Need, and paddle raises are not subject to that performance fee.
See BiddingOwl Pricing.
No. Handbid supports browser-based bidding. It also offers native-app participation.
No. BiddingOwl bidders participate through a browser without installing a dedicated bidding app.
See Silent Auction Mobile Bidding Without an App.
Yes. Handbid allows organizations to require a card before bidding and can also use a spending threshold so the card requirement begins only after the configured amount is reached.
See Handbid's credit-card settings.
Yes. Organizations using Stripe can optionally enable BiddingOwl card vaulting. Supporters may browse without entering a card and are asked for a payment method when they place a bid, purchase tickets, or make a donation.
See Should You Require a Credit Card Before Bidding?.
No. Handbid's documentation states that cards are not automatically charged simply because they are on file.
See Handbid's credit-card processing documentation.
No. With optional Stripe vaulting, the administrator controls when an applicable saved card is charged.
Handbid's current platform positioning centers on digital and mobile bidding. Organizations that specifically want paper bidding as a regular auction workflow should confirm their requirements directly with Handbid.
Both platforms support workflows that allow organizations to account for offline payments.
Yes. Handbid provides Night of Event live phone support at every current service tier for properly registered event windows. Normal support channels outside the event window depend on the service tier.
Yes. BiddingOwl publishes phone and email support during office hours, personal training by arrangement, and 24/7 critical emergency support.
See BiddingOwl Customer Service.
BiddingOwl and Handbid are both capable auction platforms, but they increasingly serve somewhat different needs.
Handbid offers a broad event and fundraising ecosystem with quote-based licensing, unlimited items and bidders under its current licensing model, native-app participation, Text-to-Give, peer-to-peer fundraising, white-label options, advanced registration tools, ACH, specialized auction formats, and formal support tiers.
BiddingOwl takes a more auction-centered approach.
It has no standard annual core-auction subscription, publishes its 5% winning-online-bid fee, keeps tickets, donations, Fund-a-Need, paddle raises, and traditional paper/live auction tools outside that fee, supports Stripe or PayPal, allows optional Stripe card vaulting, and preserves traditional paper, mobile, online, live, and hybrid workflows.
For a complex organization running multiple sophisticated fundraising events, Handbid may provide capabilities that justify its quoted licensing model.
For an organization that primarily needs flexible auction software without a standard annual core-auction commitment, BiddingOwl may provide a more straightforward fit.
The right comparison is not simply:
“Which platform has more features?”
It is:
“Which platform has the features, pricing model, workflow, and level of complexity our organization actually needs?”
The BiddingOwl Editorial Team creates practical resources for nonprofits, schools, churches, community groups, and other organizations running fundraising auctions and events. Our content is based on BiddingOwl’s experience supporting online, mobile, silent, live, and hybrid auctions, with a focus on clear guidance around auction planning, bidding, payments, checkout, and fundraising technology.
Mo-Fri 9 am to 5 pm Eastern Time
24/7 critical emergency support
All currencies supported